Focus 1
Assessment of the project addition form on the nopetnoget website
The form looks overloaded, it would be better to make the form filling step-by-step!
Author: nopetnoget editors ·
Focus 1
The form looks overloaded, it would be better to make the form filling step-by-step!
Focus 2
Personally, I'm okay with it. If I wanted to quickly get feedback from my target audience, 99 euros overall is an adequate price for such knowledge. It would save founders and developers significant amounts of money and time. But it would be better to communicate the value of such a service in exactly that way. That's why I give it an 8-9 rating.
Focus 3
Clear onboarding, create your project, publish it and order an audit for either 39 or 99. If this is the core service, then communicate it to the audience exactly that way.
It's not immediately clear what exactly the project offers. At first, you understand that you've landed on a directory of projects and startups, but it's unclear what service nopetnoget provides.
Yes, overall the project is directed at founders and people interested in new web3 projects or startups. Everything is utilitarian and simple, just a regular catalog, search, and description of each project in simple and accessible language, even a bit boring.
Unclear, it's generally not obvious what exactly the project does from the perspective of paid services. But then it becomes clear that payment is for ordering audits and posting on social networks.
The pain point of founders, finding first ambassadors and customers. Yes, the value is obvious.
Not quite convenient, there's room for improvement. It would be advisable to order a separate UX audit to improve user interaction.
All good, no errors occurred.
Yes, the distinctive feature is guaranteed posting on social networks.
Normal, a new product that still needs work, but overall there is sense to it.
Yes, I would recommend it.
Not ready yet, I can still feel a lot of 'workarounds'.