nopetnoget

← Back to the project card

believeinyourself review: what we found in testing

Author: nopetnoget editors ·

Screenshot from the believeinyourself review

Three focus questions

Focus 1

Assessment of the project addition form on the nopetnoget website

The form looks overloaded, it would be better to make the form filling step-by-step!

Focus 2

What do you think about the audit pricing of 39 euros or 99 euros for 3 audits?

Personally, I'm okay with it. If I wanted to quickly get feedback from my target audience, 99 euros overall is an adequate price for such knowledge. It would save founders and developers significant amounts of money and time. But it would be better to communicate the value of such a service in exactly that way. That's why I give it an 8-9 rating.

Focus 3

What is missing?

Clear onboarding, create your project, publish it and order an audit for either 39 or 99. If this is the core service, then communicate it to the audience exactly that way.

Project check

Rate onboarding: how easy is it to figure out the product in the first minutes?

It's not immediately clear what exactly the project offers. At first, you understand that you've landed on a directory of projects and startups, but it's unclear what service nopetnoget provides.

Does the project fit the audience the founders claim?

Yes, overall the project is directed at founders and people interested in new web3 projects or startups. Everything is utilitarian and simple, just a regular catalog, search, and description of each project in simple and accessible language, even a bit boring.

How clear and logical is the pricing of plans and packages?

Unclear, it's generally not obvious what exactly the project does from the perspective of paid services. But then it becomes clear that payment is for ordering audits and posting on social networks.

How clear is the product’s value and what problem it solves?

The pain point of founders, finding first ambassadors and customers. Yes, the value is obvious.

Rate UX quality / ease of the main flow.

Not quite convenient, there's room for improvement. It would be advisable to order a separate UX audit to improve user interaction.

How stable and predictable was the product during the test?

All good, no errors occurred.

Is there a noticeable difference from typical alternatives / competitors?

Yes, the distinctive feature is guaranteed posting on social networks.

What first impression did the product leave after a short look?

Normal, a new product that still needs work, but overall there is sense to it.

How likely are you to recommend this product to its target audience?

Yes, I would recommend it.

Rate market readiness (can it meet the need without workarounds).

Not ready yet, I can still feel a lot of 'workarounds'.

← Back to the project page